| |
home
> films
MARS ATTACKS! (1996)
Director: Tim Burton
Jack Nicholson, Glenn Close, Annette Bening, Pierce Brosnan, Danny
DeVito, Martin Short, Sarah Jessica Parker, Michael J. Fox, Rod Steiger,
Tom Jones, Lukas Haas, Natalie Portman, Jim Brown, Lisa Marie, Sylvia
Sidney
Mars Attacks! is based on a set of rather horrific bubblegum
cards which I must confess to collecting as a kid. They no doubt heralded
the start of my long descent into darkness, but the important thing is
that I’ve given up chewing bubblegum. The series was launched in 1962
and sold briefly before being taken off the market for being too shocking.
According to Zelda’s Mars Attacks! website (see below) the cards are now
worth $2000. Too bad I didn’t keep them.
In the film, as in the cards, people are melted to skeletons by death-rays,
but this is a kitsch comedy horror. It satirises 50s sci-fi B movies with
their anti-alien paranoia and gung-ho military response, but although
the reviews I’ve seen didn’t pick this up, it also satirises the ‘pro-alien’
sentimentality and naïveté of films like Close Encounters of the Third
Kind (Stephen Spielberg, 1977), in which aliens are presumed to be
well-intentioned because they are highly advanced. And it’s the release
of a dove by some hippy ‘peacenik’ that actually provokes the Martians
to start shooting, not that they really need much excuse. The Martians
are certainly the bad guys, although you can’t help admiring them for
their cruel sense of humour.
It’s as if some of the characters in the film have 50s mindsets, whilst
others belong to the 60s and later. The time in which the film is supposed
to be set is also uncertain. One might presume that it’s more-or-less
‘present day’, but communication is by telephone, not the Internet. In
fact, it’s a world without computers and the translation machine which
turns Martian barks into English is a retro icon of 50s gadgetry.
Mars Attacks! is not only a satire on sci-fi genres but, like
the work of Tarantino, a postmodern pastiche of them. The swapped heads
recall Invasion of the Body Snatchers. The Martians in a flying-saucer
gibbering with glee appear to have assimilated the ‘Smash’ advert, itself
a parody of the sci-fi genre. The Martian enthusiasm for cruel pranks
recalls the bad human-aping behaviour in Gremlins. There are many
more. And, of course, the film is so extreme as to be a self-parody.
But the film doesn’t stop at satirising sci-fi films, or even films in
general. It’s also a satire on the American way-of-life. The cringing
false sincerity of the President’s last speech can be found in thousands
of American films and TV series, not to mention in the mouths of quite
a few ‘real-life’ politicians. And whilst most of the characters respond
to the Martians with wishful-thinking or hostility, the President plans
and delivers soundbites, concerned only with making PR capital or engaging
in damage limitation. For the President, playing to the gallery is not
an adjunct to the game of politics: it is the game. (The problem in the
Clinton era is that political reality has become so absurd that it is
now difficult to satirise it!)
The comic-strip character of the bubblegum cards is perpetuated in the
film by melodramatic over-acting and the complete absence of human characterisation.
The Martians and all the leading human players are caricatures – symbols
of character types and attitudes but not real characters, and the director
manipulates these to make satirical and ironic points. The same postmodern
superficiality is reflected in the almost non-existent plot. There’s no
explanation for the Martian invasion – it’s done just for the hell of
it.
The film itself is an irony, enjoying a bigger budget and a more expensive
cast than many of the films it satirises. But the cliché of film stardom
itself is also subversively targeted by the film’s satire. The big stars
function only as cardboard cut-outs before being snuffed in various unpleasant
ways. This fate contrasts dramatically with that of the lesser stars who
escape and realise a demotic triumph. A further postmodern twist is introduced
with the appearance of crooner Tom Jones, playing himself. This inverts
the sci-fi genre of the fantastic entering the real and presents us with
a scene of the real entering the fantastic.
I’m not suggesting that all this turns the film into a profound postmodernist
statement, but the signs are there for those who care to read them.
Rik – 18 May 2000
|
|