FluxEuropa has suspended active
publication and no longer requires items for review. The site
is, however, being maintained as an archive and you can still
order Amazon products which helps to subsidise its continuation.
Handsome, sharp and vigorous, exuberant, manic and abusive are just some
of the adjectives which can and have been applied to Camille Paglia,
the motor-mouthed academic and cultural critic of Italian-American background
and 'wavering sexual orientation'. Paglia was catapulted into media stardom
when, following publication of her book, Sexual Personae, in 1992,
she achieved fame if not infamy with expressions of her admiration for
Madonna, and her involvement in bitter public controversies about 'date
rape' and the state of academe.
Like Nietzsche, a source of influence along with Freud, Jung and Amelia
Earhart, Paglia is a sort of anti-intellectual intellectual, who lauds
vigorous scholarly discipline and the mass pop culture of modern
society. Whilst criticising postmodernist philosophising, she's a prophet
of postmodern culture. This ambiguity runs deep. Difficult to put into
a neat, preconceived, pigeon-hole, she has been accused of being both
an anti-feminist and a neoconservative, while claiming, herself, to be
a genuine libertarian whose cultural critiques have merely upset the feminist
party line and the academic gravy train.
For Paglia, female power is sexual power, and sex is dark and dangerous.
This innate female power is exercised through beauty and glamour, values
denied or rejected by the anti-aesthetic puritanism of contemporary feminists,
whom she further provoked by suggesting that women should take some responsibility
for their own safety. This, she argues, is not to condone rape and brutality,
but to add an element of realism. Paglia sees female vulnerability largely
as a problem for naive upper middle class WASPs whose utopian assumptions
and rejection of biological reality have rendered them vulnerable.
Paglia sees civilisation as a fragile brake on human cruelty, a brake
removed by extreme ideas of freedom indulged in the 60s. This makes her
view of the human condition essentially conservative, but she is far from
being a conservative.
Paglia is in her element scourging the pretentiousness and shoddiness
of pseudo-leftist academics who have made a dull, if lucrative, career
out of social deconstructionism à la Derrida and Foucault. At her
best, she is a well-oiled critical machine-gun, subjecting her targets
to a withering and remorseless fusillade. At her worst, she is drunk on
the aggressive thrill of her own invective - vituperative and repetitious.
Paglia, who is Professor of Humanities at the University of the Arts
in Philadelphia, is in love with visual and aural culture, and is conducting
a duel against the 'word-fetishism' of cultural criticism emanating from
English departments. As a prophet of modern popular culture she follows
in the footsteps of Marshall McLuhan, while her knowing references to
its minutiae recall the sardonic treatment of the same in the work of
Quentin Tarantino.
Rik - Updated: 10 October 1996. Amended: 26 May 2000.